On 04/10/2013 08:49 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote: > On Apr 10, 2013, at 15:33 , Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> That's a bit weird, I've pushed the source rpms again. They seem fine now. > Got them, and now they all seem ok. Weird indeed... should we worry? > > Stephan I wouldn't worry. Pat >> Thanks for the heads up! >> >> Pat >> >> On 04/10/2013 06:36 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> rsync just found the devtoolset packages in 6x/external_products . It's great that these are now available - thanks. >>> >>> Something is fishy about some of the SRPMs though: >>> >>> % rpm -Kv * >>> devtoolset-1.0-1-3.el6.src.rpm: >>> Header SHA1 digest: OK (e3fb27de1dc1e8fb4da3d3fc592b5b8209115b67) >>> MD5 digest: BAD Expected(21f1e739a25c2d0f1eaa73c618854a25) != (9154336af925dc5180c737223221deab) >>> devtoolset-1.0-binutils-2.22.52.0.1-10.el6.src.rpm: >>> Header SHA1 digest: OK (ba36711c1fb091b806f7e1777a5749ef3b86e249) >>> MD5 digest: BAD Expected(0a9f5ab19cf918d7635fe1f947bd8560) != (bc8d8a3c8906797a7aa127bc60e6ba2a) >>> devtoolset-1.0-gcc-4.7.0-5.2.el6.src.rpm: >>> Header SHA1 digest: OK (4e9201f5cfad748e58f5cc701243d6e5fa31acad) >>> MD5 digest: BAD Expected(20649292311031dcb0c5a386d095b5fa) != (734e040004df004374beb2050402caf2) >>> devtoolset-1.0-gcc-4.7.0-5.3.el6.src.rpm: >>> Header SHA1 digest: OK (baaf8b2b39c7cdc40df8d424a73bac4d23fad81b) >>> MD5 digest: BAD Expected(cb4caf107795be889d59c5bc0765cca9) != (13e06674c286afde3ff897911651b317) >>> devtoolset-1.0-gdb-7.4.50.20120120-46.el6.src.rpm: >>> Header SHA1 digest: OK (7c41b9fbd0a7f56dc5f2248cbda2703c34164dac) >>> MD5 digest: BAD Expected(b9b4da3c4a102b8759b1e74b742d6f3e) != (197ce4293b98d1bbe96bf8205e6cc615) >>> scl-utils-20120229-1.el6.src.rpm: >>> Header SHA1 digest: OK (ae65f7e525d9d2bde9f93945f959ff5682267435) >>> MD5 digest: BAD Expected(bf89fd06e82df088ccfa66ab68a4a30a) != (194ec423d5bbe55a2e445ecee6a4a721) >>> >>> Is this expected? >>> >>> Stephan >>> -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/