On 03/18/2013 09:50 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:57:08 -0500 > Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> On 03/15/2013 01:04 PM, Andras Horvath wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:59:51 +0100 >>> Andras Horvath <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:50:37 -0500 >>>> Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 03/15/2013 10:48 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:17:02 -0500 >>>>>> Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 03/15/2013 08:48 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>>>>>> On 03/15/2013 05:54 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yesterday came a huge update regarding the kernel >>>>>>>>> (2.6.32-358.2.1) and the X (xorg and libs). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> System is SL 6.3, 64 bit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since this update the sandbox windows cannot be resized with >>>>>>>>> Firefox. I run FF in sandbox with this command: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sandbox -i ~/.mozilla/plugins -t sandbox_net_t -X -- firefox >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> AFAIK the ability to resize an X sandbox window is a special >>>>>>>>> patch from TUV which therefore makes this ability to be >>>>>>>>> available only on RHEL (and so SL) and not on Fedora. This one >>>>>>>>> came with an update when the system version was at 6.2. Before >>>>>>>>> that it was not available. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Another regression I seem to have noticed is that the adobe >>>>>>>>> flash plugin crashes or simply doesn't behave properly. >>>>>>>>> Sometimes the flash area on the web page stays blank on some >>>>>>>>> specific sites. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I tested these in FF with an empty profile too, but the same >>>>>>>>> happens. Didn't have any problem before yesterday. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd appreciate any help. Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andras >>>>>>>> hmmmmm >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I fear I've a ton of questions, so forgive my rather shotgun >>>>>>>> approach. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do hate X updates as security errata, not all dependencies >>>>>>>> are listed as 'Requires' which makes for all sorts of fun..... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a new policycoreutils build for 6.4, nothing that I >>>>>>>> pushed yesterday listed it as a requirement so it wasn't >>>>>>>> pushed. But it is the rpm providing 'sandbox'. Maybe we've >>>>>>>> got a bugfix or two here.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can I have you try updating those rpms: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://ftp2.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/repoview/letter_p.group.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (you can also do yum --releasever=6rolling update >>>>>>>> policycoreutil* if that is more convenient) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you having the flash problems in a sandbox or just naively? >>>>>>>> If it is in a sandbox, does the problem persist when run >>>>>>>> naively? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just to verify, you've booted into the new kernel, right? If >>>>>>>> not can I have you check and see if the problems follow you >>>>>>>> there? (Forgive the seeming obviousness of the question, but >>>>>>>> sometimes the answer is 'no') >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do the problems you've reported persist on the older kernel? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I show the current adobe flash rpm as >>>>>>>> flash-plugin-11.2.202.275-release.x86_64 , it was released >>>>>>>> earlier in the week. Did you get that update? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any chance I can see a copy of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you've got the binary only drivers, what version are they >>>>>>>> and where did you get them? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any chance for your X logs from a session where you've got the >>>>>>>> problems? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll look at some stuff and see what I can see, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pat >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been able to replicate the 'cannot resize' problem other >>>>>>> popular rebuilds of TUV and SL 6.4 BETA2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My guess is that this is an upstream bug. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've not been able to replicate the flash problems outside of >>>>>>> the sandbox. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pat >>>>>> I reproduced the flash problem along with the sandbox resize on a >>>>>> freshly installed SL 6.3 VM too with and also without upgrading >>>>>> policycoreutils to the version in 6.4. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I'm gonna create a bug report at TUV. Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Andras >>>>> When you get it made can you send me the bugzilla number so I can >>>>> follow its progress? >>>>> >>>>> Pat >>>> I was gonna in either way write back the link of my bug report for >>>> the record, but before starting it I searched for any similar and >>>> found this one reported 3 weeks ago: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915202 >>>> >>>> In short: TUV got the resize patch removed. >>>> >>>> Any idea for the flash problem? Some of my clients reported it too >>>> and I got this link which doesn't work either (flash game, in the >>>> middle of the screen the pool game doesn't come up): >>>> >>>> http://www.miniclip.com/games/8-ball-pool-multiplayer/en/ >>>> >>>> (Sorry, but cannot find better test page currently) >>>> >>>> I'll test it by downgrading my flash and will report back. >>>> >>>> >>>> Andras >>> Problem persists with different versions of flash plugins too. >>> >>> Andras >> I've been unable to replicate.... >> > Just a feedback on this: consider the flash problem solved now. The > websites I was checking at the time started working again, so > mysteriously they were just malfunctioning and I thought it has > something to do with the the update I mentioned earlier. > > Thanks for checking! > > Andras Glad things are working! Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/