On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:57:08 -0500 Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 03/15/2013 01:04 PM, Andras Horvath wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:59:51 +0100 > > Andras Horvath <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:50:37 -0500 > >> Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/15/2013 10:48 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:17:02 -0500 > >>>> Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 03/15/2013 08:48 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > >>>>>> On 03/15/2013 05:54 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yesterday came a huge update regarding the kernel > >>>>>>> (2.6.32-358.2.1) and the X (xorg and libs). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> System is SL 6.3, 64 bit. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Since this update the sandbox windows cannot be resized with > >>>>>>> Firefox. I run FF in sandbox with this command: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> sandbox -i ~/.mozilla/plugins -t sandbox_net_t -X -- firefox > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> AFAIK the ability to resize an X sandbox window is a special > >>>>>>> patch from TUV which therefore makes this ability to be > >>>>>>> available only on RHEL (and so SL) and not on Fedora. This one > >>>>>>> came with an update when the system version was at 6.2. Before > >>>>>>> that it was not available. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Another regression I seem to have noticed is that the adobe > >>>>>>> flash plugin crashes or simply doesn't behave properly. > >>>>>>> Sometimes the flash area on the web page stays blank on some > >>>>>>> specific sites. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I tested these in FF with an empty profile too, but the same > >>>>>>> happens. Didn't have any problem before yesterday. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd appreciate any help. Thanks! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Andras > >>>>>> hmmmmm > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I fear I've a ton of questions, so forgive my rather shotgun > >>>>>> approach. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I do hate X updates as security errata, not all dependencies > >>>>>> are listed as 'Requires' which makes for all sorts of fun..... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is a new policycoreutils build for 6.4, nothing that I > >>>>>> pushed yesterday listed it as a requirement so it wasn't > >>>>>> pushed. But it is the rpm providing 'sandbox'. Maybe we've > >>>>>> got a bugfix or two here.... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can I have you try updating those rpms: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://ftp2.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/repoview/letter_p.group.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (you can also do yum --releasever=6rolling update > >>>>>> policycoreutil* if that is more convenient) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are you having the flash problems in a sandbox or just naively? > >>>>>> If it is in a sandbox, does the problem persist when run > >>>>>> naively? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Just to verify, you've booted into the new kernel, right? If > >>>>>> not can I have you check and see if the problems follow you > >>>>>> there? (Forgive the seeming obviousness of the question, but > >>>>>> sometimes the answer is 'no') > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do the problems you've reported persist on the older kernel? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I show the current adobe flash rpm as > >>>>>> flash-plugin-11.2.202.275-release.x86_64 , it was released > >>>>>> earlier in the week. Did you get that update? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any chance I can see a copy of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you've got the binary only drivers, what version are they > >>>>>> and where did you get them? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any chance for your X logs from a session where you've got the > >>>>>> problems? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'll look at some stuff and see what I can see, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Pat > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> I've been able to replicate the 'cannot resize' problem other > >>>>> popular rebuilds of TUV and SL 6.4 BETA2. > >>>>> > >>>>> My guess is that this is an upstream bug. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've not been able to replicate the flash problems outside of > >>>>> the sandbox. > >>>>> > >>>>> Pat > >>>> I reproduced the flash problem along with the sandbox resize on a > >>>> freshly installed SL 6.3 VM too with and also without upgrading > >>>> policycoreutils to the version in 6.4. > >>>> > >>>> So I'm gonna create a bug report at TUV. Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Andras > >>> When you get it made can you send me the bugzilla number so I can > >>> follow its progress? > >>> > >>> Pat > >> I was gonna in either way write back the link of my bug report for > >> the record, but before starting it I searched for any similar and > >> found this one reported 3 weeks ago: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915202 > >> > >> In short: TUV got the resize patch removed. > >> > >> Any idea for the flash problem? Some of my clients reported it too > >> and I got this link which doesn't work either (flash game, in the > >> middle of the screen the pool game doesn't come up): > >> > >> http://www.miniclip.com/games/8-ball-pool-multiplayer/en/ > >> > >> (Sorry, but cannot find better test page currently) > >> > >> I'll test it by downgrading my flash and will report back. > >> > >> > >> Andras > > Problem persists with different versions of flash plugins too. > > > > Andras > > I've been unable to replicate.... > Just a feedback on this: consider the flash problem solved now. The websites I was checking at the time started working again, so mysteriously they were just malfunctioning and I thought it has something to do with the the update I mentioned earlier. Thanks for checking! Andras