On 03/15/2013 01:04 PM, Andras Horvath wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:59:51 +0100 > Andras Horvath <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:50:37 -0500 >> Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> On 03/15/2013 10:48 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: >>>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:17:02 -0500 >>>> Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 03/15/2013 08:48 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>>>> On 03/15/2013 05:54 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yesterday came a huge update regarding the kernel >>>>>>> (2.6.32-358.2.1) and the X (xorg and libs). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> System is SL 6.3, 64 bit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since this update the sandbox windows cannot be resized with >>>>>>> Firefox. I run FF in sandbox with this command: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sandbox -i ~/.mozilla/plugins -t sandbox_net_t -X -- firefox >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AFAIK the ability to resize an X sandbox window is a special >>>>>>> patch from TUV which therefore makes this ability to be >>>>>>> available only on RHEL (and so SL) and not on Fedora. This one >>>>>>> came with an update when the system version was at 6.2. Before >>>>>>> that it was not available. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Another regression I seem to have noticed is that the adobe >>>>>>> flash plugin crashes or simply doesn't behave properly. >>>>>>> Sometimes the flash area on the web page stays blank on some >>>>>>> specific sites. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I tested these in FF with an empty profile too, but the same >>>>>>> happens. Didn't have any problem before yesterday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd appreciate any help. Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andras >>>>>> hmmmmm >>>>>> >>>>>> I fear I've a ton of questions, so forgive my rather shotgun >>>>>> approach. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do hate X updates as security errata, not all dependencies are >>>>>> listed as 'Requires' which makes for all sorts of fun..... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a new policycoreutils build for 6.4, nothing that I >>>>>> pushed yesterday listed it as a requirement so it wasn't pushed. >>>>>> But it is the rpm providing 'sandbox'. Maybe we've got a bugfix >>>>>> or two here.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Can I have you try updating those rpms: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ftp2.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/repoview/letter_p.group.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> (you can also do yum --releasever=6rolling update >>>>>> policycoreutil* if that is more convenient) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you having the flash problems in a sandbox or just naively? >>>>>> If it is in a sandbox, does the problem persist when run >>>>>> naively? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just to verify, you've booted into the new kernel, right? If not >>>>>> can I have you check and see if the problems follow you there? >>>>>> (Forgive the seeming obviousness of the question, but sometimes >>>>>> the answer is 'no') >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Do the problems you've reported persist on the older kernel? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I show the current adobe flash rpm as >>>>>> flash-plugin-11.2.202.275-release.x86_64 , it was released >>>>>> earlier in the week. Did you get that update? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any chance I can see a copy of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you've got the binary only drivers, what version are they and >>>>>> where did you get them? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any chance for your X logs from a session where you've got the >>>>>> problems? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll look at some stuff and see what I can see, >>>>>> >>>>>> Pat >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I've been able to replicate the 'cannot resize' problem other >>>>> popular rebuilds of TUV and SL 6.4 BETA2. >>>>> >>>>> My guess is that this is an upstream bug. >>>>> >>>>> I've not been able to replicate the flash problems outside of the >>>>> sandbox. >>>>> >>>>> Pat >>>> I reproduced the flash problem along with the sandbox resize on a >>>> freshly installed SL 6.3 VM too with and also without upgrading >>>> policycoreutils to the version in 6.4. >>>> >>>> So I'm gonna create a bug report at TUV. Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> Andras >>> When you get it made can you send me the bugzilla number so I can >>> follow its progress? >>> >>> Pat >> I was gonna in either way write back the link of my bug report for the >> record, but before starting it I searched for any similar and found >> this one reported 3 weeks ago: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915202 >> >> In short: TUV got the resize patch removed. >> >> Any idea for the flash problem? Some of my clients reported it too and >> I got this link which doesn't work either (flash game, in the middle >> of the screen the pool game doesn't come up): >> >> http://www.miniclip.com/games/8-ball-pool-multiplayer/en/ >> >> (Sorry, but cannot find better test page currently) >> >> I'll test it by downgrading my flash and will report back. >> >> >> Andras > Problem persists with different versions of flash plugins too. > > Andras I've been unable to replicate.... -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/