On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:17:02 -0500 Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 03/15/2013 08:48 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > > On 03/15/2013 05:54 AM, Andras Horvath wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Yesterday came a huge update regarding the kernel (2.6.32-358.2.1) > >> and the X (xorg and libs). > >> > >> System is SL 6.3, 64 bit. > >> > >> Since this update the sandbox windows cannot be resized with > >> Firefox. I run FF in sandbox with this command: > >> > >> sandbox -i ~/.mozilla/plugins -t sandbox_net_t -X -- firefox > >> > >> AFAIK the ability to resize an X sandbox window is a special patch > >> from TUV which therefore makes this ability to be available only > >> on RHEL (and so SL) and not on Fedora. This one came with an > >> update when the system version was at 6.2. Before that it was not > >> available. > >> > >> Another regression I seem to have noticed is that the adobe flash > >> plugin crashes or simply doesn't behave properly. Sometimes the > >> flash area on the web page stays blank on some specific sites. > >> > >> I tested these in FF with an empty profile too, but the same > >> happens. Didn't have any problem before yesterday. > >> > >> I'd appreciate any help. Thanks! > >> > >> > >> Andras > > > > hmmmmm > > > > I fear I've a ton of questions, so forgive my rather shotgun > > approach. > > > > I do hate X updates as security errata, not all dependencies are > > listed as 'Requires' which makes for all sorts of fun..... > > > > > > > > There is a new policycoreutils build for 6.4, nothing that I pushed > > yesterday listed it as a requirement so it wasn't pushed. But it is > > the rpm providing 'sandbox'. Maybe we've got a bugfix or two > > here.... > > > > Can I have you try updating those rpms: > > > > http://ftp2.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/repoview/letter_p.group.html > > > > > > (you can also do yum --releasever=6rolling update policycoreutil* > > if that is more convenient) > > > > > > > > Are you having the flash problems in a sandbox or just naively? If > > it is in a sandbox, does the problem persist when run naively? > > > > > > > > Just to verify, you've booted into the new kernel, right? If not > > can I have you check and see if the problems follow you there? > > (Forgive the seeming obviousness of the question, but sometimes the > > answer is 'no') > > > > > > > > Do the problems you've reported persist on the older kernel? > > > > > > > > I show the current adobe flash rpm as > > flash-plugin-11.2.202.275-release.x86_64 , it was released earlier > > in the week. Did you get that update? > > > > > > > > Any chance I can see a copy of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf? > > > > > > If you've got the binary only drivers, what version are they and > > where did you get them? > > > > > > > > Any chance for your X logs from a session where you've got the > > problems? > > > > > > > > I'll look at some stuff and see what I can see, > > > > Pat > > > > > > I've been able to replicate the 'cannot resize' problem other popular > rebuilds of TUV and SL 6.4 BETA2. > > My guess is that this is an upstream bug. > > I've not been able to replicate the flash problems outside of the > sandbox. > > Pat I reproduced the flash problem along with the sandbox resize on a freshly installed SL 6.3 VM too with and also without upgrading policycoreutils to the version in 6.4. So I'm gonna create a bug report at TUV. Thanks. Andras