On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Connie Sieh
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
I have a question regarding the various RPM repos for the SL6.
Some of the repos have a major.minor version number:
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.1/
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.2/
And then there are repos for the '6' and '6x' releases:
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6/
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/
The subdirectories of //ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6/ just point to //ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/ . This was just to make it easy to find "6" .
and a repo named '6rolling':
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/
My questions:
- What are the differences between these different kinds of repos?
- When should I be tracking the '6' repository vs the 6.2 repository vs.
the '6rolling' repository?
6x is a symbolic link that points to the "current" release of 6. This is so you always "find" the current release. We also provide a "yum-conf" which which "points" to 6x. When a new "point" release is made all the systems with their yum-confs "pointing" to 6x will be updated to this newer version. Note the "non yum-conf 6x" will keep the system at that point release.
I am mostly interested in security updates, and am less interested in feature updates. Will the 6.N repositories (6.1, 6.2, etc) continue to receive security updates for several years, or should I consider upgrading to the next point release (From 6.1 to 6.2, for example) in order to continue receiving security updates?
We will update the faq. This is a very good question for it.
Thank you Connie!
-= Stefan