On 15/02/2012 2:00 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 07:25 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> On 15/02/2012 12:15 AM, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
>>> I came across this problem. Have managed to get around for now by
>>> recompiling latest glibc SRPM with patch from Debian to solve that
>>> problem[1].
>>>
>>> Bart
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http:[log in to unmask]
>>>
>>
>> Great find! I've added a link to it in the RH Bugzilla.
>
> Good catch!
>
> Has anyone opened a RHEL specific bug so that the RHEL packagers are
> made aware?

Out of interest, is there any way to see (easily) if the patch attached 
applies cleanly to the build environment used to rebuild the SL packages?

My machine for building RPMs is really hacked together for a specific 
set of RPMs - and I don't really want to upset its design task to make 
it happy enough to attempt a glibc rebuild! :)

Its taken directly from the Debian patch to fix the bug on their 
packages. I can't find anything directly relating to Fedora or EL* at 
this point.

--
Steven Haigh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299