Looks good to me :)
I really didn't find the 6x dir on http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/ yesterday-maybe because it was 10pm.
And I read '6x HAS to be replaced by 62', not 'CAN be replaced by 62', my bad.

But none the less - thanks a lot!

cheers
Christoph

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2012 21:43
An: Galuschka Christoph
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] Update of https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/howto/upgrade.6x

On 02/16/2012 02:26 PM, Christoph Galuschka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as I just ran into it I thought the idea of a little update to
> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/howto/upgrade.6x might be
> handy:
> It says:
> yum --releasever=6x update sl-release
> Note: 6x can be replaced with whatever version you wish to go to, such as
> 6.2
> So I tried "--releasever=62". No need to mention it didn't work :( So I
> looked at the download site and found "--releasever=6.2" works fine :)
> So maybe change the line to
> yum --releasever=6.x update sl-release
> Note: 6.x can be replaced with whatever version you wish to go to, such as
> 6.2
> Just my 2 cents
>
> all the best and great work on 6.2
> cheers
> Christoph

Glad you are enjoying 6.2!

I've modified the webpage based on your feedback.  Does it look less 
likely to confuse anyone in the future?  We have an actual '6x' 
directory that works so I've provided a second example so that users can 
simply paste in the bold text, or follow the pattern of the secondary 
fixed with text.

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer