On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 00:50 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> 
> Maybe it is due to I run it under Fedora 12 with rpm-4.7.2 ?

Nope, rpm-4.8.1 the same results.
> 
> BTW, what is a reason to sign already TUV-signed package again by SL
> sign (if it is actually a case)?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Dmitry Butskoy
>