On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 00:50 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > > Maybe it is due to I run it under Fedora 12 with rpm-4.7.2 ? Nope, rpm-4.8.1 the same results. > > BTW, what is a reason to sign already TUV-signed package again by SL > sign (if it is actually a case)? > > > Regards, > Dmitry Butskoy >