On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 14:06 -0500, Troy Dawson wrote: > On 06/22/2011 12:57 PM, S.Tindall wrote: > > Troy/Connie: > > > > While updating from SL 5.5 to SL 5.6, yum with gpgcheck enabled > > complained that anaconda was not signed: > > > > # cat /etc/redhat-release > > Scientific Linux SL release 5.6 (Boron) > > > > # yum update anaconda anaconda-runtime > > ... > > Package anaconda-11.1.2.224-2.SL.x86_64.rpm is not signed > > > > I think the 32-bit version and both arch of anaconda-runtime are > > unsigned, too. > > > > > > Steve > > I apologize for that. > You were correct, anaconda and anaconda-runtime for both i368 and x86_64 > were not signed. We double checked and found patch for i386 was also > not signed. > We have signed the packages, put them in the appropriate places, and > rebuild the appropriate yum repositories. Everything should be working > again. > Please remember that since I just barely did this, you will probrubly > have to run > yum clean all > before yum see's the change. > Thank You > Troy Dawson Yes, anaconda now updates without issues. Thanks, Steve