Am 12.05.2011 19:07, schrieb Stephen John Smoogen: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:20, Miguel Angel Diaz > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I agree with you that packages have their own licenses. >> >> But my question follows in other way. Imagine I want to create >> other .iso based on S.L.iso. I need to read .iso license to know if I am >> doing well. >> >> Regards. >> >> > > Ok I understand the question, and will try to better explain it to others. > > A package by itself has a license, but so does the distribution as a > whole. The Fedora distribution and original Red Hat Linux distribution > were licensed under the GPL v2. Miguel is wondering what license Fermi > is offering the distribution under as this affects how others can use > the distribution, derive child distributions etc from it. Given that andd as its a derivate of RHEL it should be GPLc2 also. Only my guestimation. Cheers, Frank