You have performed a great service setting up the forum.  It has been quite
helpful for a lot of people, and long overdue.

Your comments on CentOS are exactly correct.  I think very few people
actually take much pleasure in the events there, since CentOS has been a
great service to the community for many years.  Their development crew seems
to be under a lot of stress and not responding perfectly.

It does make a striking contrast with the supremely helpful people I've
dealt with on the Scientific side though.  I hope they get their issues
resolved soon.


On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:46 PM, john h outlan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:39 PM, john h outlan <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:31 PM, curriegrad2004 <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you link to the forums so we can all discuss stuff on there. It
>>> would also be nice if somebody created a #sl channel on freenode too
>>> ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi....the forum link is http://scientificlinuxforum.org.  It's up to 155
>> members today.  We're getting many CentOS "refugees" as of late at the rate
>> of about 4 or 5 per day :)  The Survey notice has been posted there under
>> Announcements.
>>
>>
> to clarify:  we are pleased at the forum that we gain 4 or 5 members or
> more per day, steady.  It's a lot of work and I'm actually out of pocket on
> it.  We are not pleased with a CentOS demise.  We don't allow any such
> meaningless remarks on the forum either, other than civil conversation
> and/or speculation in good conversation.  Sorry for the waste of time.
>