Retroactive continuity. As in, changing something established in a previous
thing after the fact. I believe we had a logo change between 5.x and 6. So
hence, even though 5.x never used it before until now, I was requesting
that the redhat-logos package be updated for 5.6 to have the logo we're
using now (although, the designs I'm using for stuff in this motif is based
off the old logo, just as a sort of tribute)

And also, I do plan on imitating all the color variations for the upstream
wallpaper.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Shawn,
> Wow, I like that.
>
> I'm not totally sure what you mean by "retconned in the packaging."
>
> Troy
>
>
> On 05/27/2011 09:23 AM, Shawn Thompson wrote:
>
>> Of course, though to speed things up (and make it clear this isn't
>> "new"), I'm trying a more minimal look that would match with that
>> version's desktop theme (i.e. what is now called ClearlooksClassic)
>>
>> like http://i.imgur.com/joagL.png
>>
>> Despite the fact that this stuff is going to be based off the old logo,
>> I'd like however, to have the current logo and the new logotype to be
>> retconned in the packaging.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]
>>  <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>>    On 05/26/2011 05:14 PM, Shawn Thompson wrote:
>>
>>        Yet again, while I still wait for response on the plans for 6.1
>>        (whether
>>        we are going to use that artwork/new logotype/etc or not), I
>>        ''could''
>>        throw something together for 5.6. Would be a different motif,
>>        but would
>>        still try to be as nice as say, upstream.
>>
>>        Would you accept this?
>>
>>
>>    Hi Shawn,
>>    Sorry, I didn't know you were waiting for word back from us.
>>
>>    SL 6.1 artwork
>>    - I really like what you've done, so does everyone I've talked to.
>>      I'm sorry, I really should have told that to you.  We would really
>>    like to use your work.
>>
>>    How fast do you think you can complete it?  I ask that because I
>>    think we're on schedule to get the first 6.1 Alpha release out next
>>    week.
>>
>>    If you want, I can use what you currently have and start integrating
>>    it in.
>>
>>    SL 5.6 artwork
>>    - SL 5.6 has been delayed way too much.  At this point I want to get
>>    it out the door without another delay.
>>    If you start working on SL 5.7, that would be wonderful.
>>
>>    Thank You
>>    Troy
>>    --
>>    __________________________________________________
>>    Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> (630)840-6468
>>    <tel:%28630%29840-6468>
>>
>>    Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
>>    __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
> Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
> __________________________________________________
>