On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hello,
> As was stated before, for Scientific Linux 6, if a package is in EPEL, we 
> would like to keep it in EPEL.
> But there are some packages that we feel should go into Scientific Linux. 
> This usually because they are needed during the installation process, or for 
> some other reason.
> I am trying to gather the list of packages we will need to add.
> Here is what I currently have.
>
> - packages changed/added for trademark reasons and/or branding.
> - SL tweaks packages
> - openafs (it isn't in EPEL)
> - icewm (it isn't in EPEL and it would be good during the install)
> - revisor (will be used for building distributions and sites)
> - firmware - specifically network based firmware
>
> Here is what is in epel thus far.
> http://mirror.anl.gov/fedora/epel/beta/6/

I don't see kile (an Integrated LaTeX Environment,
http://kile.sourceforge.net/ ) there although it is in dag/rpmforge.

(Whilst LyX uses LaTeX a standard LateX user cannot use a LyX
document, so I consider kile is a better LaTeX GUI than LyX).

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna