On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Troy Dawson wrote: > Hello, > As was stated before, for Scientific Linux 6, if a package is in EPEL, we > would like to keep it in EPEL. > But there are some packages that we feel should go into Scientific Linux. > This usually because they are needed during the installation process, or for > some other reason. > I am trying to gather the list of packages we will need to add. > Here is what I currently have. > > - packages changed/added for trademark reasons and/or branding. > - SL tweaks packages > - openafs (it isn't in EPEL) > - icewm (it isn't in EPEL and it would be good during the install) > - revisor (will be used for building distributions and sites) > - firmware - specifically network based firmware > > Here is what is in epel thus far. > http://mirror.anl.gov/fedora/epel/beta/6/ I don't see kile (an Integrated LaTeX Environment, http://kile.sourceforge.net/ ) there although it is in dag/rpmforge. (Whilst LyX uses LaTeX a standard LateX user cannot use a LyX document, so I consider kile is a better LaTeX GUI than LyX). -- Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge [log in to unmask] http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna