Troy Dawson wrote: > Alex Owen wrote: > ... >> Please Please Please can we try and avoid this or at least document >> simmilar issues for SL6??? >> > ... > > Nothing we could do to avoid it. Fair point! Though it still seems that there is a binary (as opposed to source) bug in the SL autoconf package if we are trying to match The Upstream Vendor as evidenced elsewhere in this thread. > Hopefully we *can* avoid it for SL6, but my real question is for the > second half of your question. Phew! > If you were looking, where would you expect to find this documentation? > > That is always the hardest part of documentation, getting the document > to the person who needs it. > > I can write up a m4 web page for SL5. Where would people expect it > to be? > > And if there was something similar for SL6, where would people expect > it to be? Good point.... In this context perhaps in build system documentation.... how about here: https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/buildsystem/SL5 https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/buildsystem/SL6 Thanks Alex Owen