Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:03:00PM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> Note: jdk-1.6.0_17-fcs.x86_64.rpm is not signed, and we cannot sign it 
>> without breaking it.

> Can you fix "yum" instead, so all updates are not blocked by the unsigned jdk rpm,
> requiring that I go to each machine and fix the "jdk" rpm by hand?

We use a script to move such ill-behaved RPMs in to a separate repository, and 
then configure that repo (only) to allow unsigned RPMs to be installed.

Re-arranging the SL repos in this way might be the least effort work-around.
It could also potentially give folk the option of deciding if they are happy 
to install unsigned packages.

    Shane
-- 
Shane Voss, Computing Officer, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.