Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:03:00PM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote: >> Note: jdk-1.6.0_17-fcs.x86_64.rpm is not signed, and we cannot sign it >> without breaking it. > Can you fix "yum" instead, so all updates are not blocked by the unsigned jdk rpm, > requiring that I go to each machine and fix the "jdk" rpm by hand? We use a script to move such ill-behaved RPMs in to a separate repository, and then configure that repo (only) to allow unsigned RPMs to be installed. Re-arranging the SL repos in this way might be the least effort work-around. It could also potentially give folk the option of deciding if they are happy to install unsigned packages. Shane -- Shane Voss, Computing Officer, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.