Patrick wrote: > I have tested SL5.3RC1 on my Proliant testserver with sata RAID > configuration (Promise FastTrak Sata150) and was pleased to see that > SL had little trouble with it (where Fedora 11 alpha (!), Debian 5.0 > and SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 failed to detect and configure > it). RHEL, SL and CentOS seem to have no problems with it (SUSE > complained that only a 2.4 kernel would support it, a 2.6 kernel would > not?!?). > > One thing I came across (just with previous versions of RHEL, SL, > CentOS, etc.) is the problem that not all monitors are > automatically/correctly detected. This results in problems when you > reboot into graphical mode after the installation (firstboot has no > problems). Details are in the bugreport > (https://www.scientificlinux.org/bug.feature/bugs/15/pcng_issue_view). > Would it be an idea to make notice of this in the release notes > (section "Issues"?). > > I do not mention this bug (again) to argue with people who don't seem > to have this problem (and keep informing me I have something > isolated), but rather because the new Fedora 11 alpha seems to solve > this problem by introducing a "install with default driver" option > with the grub menu on their installation dvd. That was a good idea, > because where RHEL/SL/CentOS didn't give me graphical problems during > install, the new Fedora did also mess up my graphics during the > graphical installation (unless I selected the "default driver" > option). > > Hope it is helpful. > > Regards, > Patrick Got it. It's in under the "Limitations" section. I did a little editing, but it's close to what you had written. Troy -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group __________________________________________________