On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Robert Burch wrote: > Dear All, > > Are the md5sum's for SL 5.2 x86_64 iso's OK? > > I pulled down SL 52 x86_64 iso's (Tue Jun 24 13:02:36 CDT 2008) from: > ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/iso/x86_64/ > Ran my md5sum against them, but they did not match. > > [me@xxxxx]$ md5sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso > 937abd48c9a56fb41339a9ab50f53ab6 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso These are sha1sum's not md5sum. TUV switched from md5sum to sha1sum on RHEL 5. [root@linux44 x86_64]# sha1sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso 079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso > > [me@xxxxx]$ cat SL.52.061808.x86_64.SHA1SUM > 079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso > ... > > Or am I confused? > > Thanks, > > Robert Burch Jr > Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University > > PS Great job on SL and this list!! > -Connie Sieh