Troy Dawson wrote:
> Jan Iven wrote:
>> On 24/01/08 10:03, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>
>>> It would certainly be nice to have both at the same OpenAFS release, and
>>> the 1.4.6-58 client is doing fine on a number of SL4 systems here. I'm
>>> not sure that the DOS issue is serious enough that we couldn't wait for
>>> the next kernel update or SL release though.
>>
>> FYI, a new RHEL4 kernel is (hopefully :-) ) pending, as per
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428791
>>
>> No idea on AFS-1.4.6 though, while we have the patch on (some?most?)
>> servers, our clients are still at 1.4.4.
>>
>> Regards
>> jan
> 
> OK, It's sounding like we should do it for SL5, but maybe wait on SL4, 
> at least until SL 4.6 comes out with it to get it better tested on SL4.


We will update our SL4 and SL5 clients to openafs 1.4.6 in Feb.

	Urs