Troy Dawson wrote: > Jan Iven wrote: >> On 24/01/08 10:03, [log in to unmask] wrote: >> >>> It would certainly be nice to have both at the same OpenAFS release, and >>> the 1.4.6-58 client is doing fine on a number of SL4 systems here. I'm >>> not sure that the DOS issue is serious enough that we couldn't wait for >>> the next kernel update or SL release though. >> >> FYI, a new RHEL4 kernel is (hopefully :-) ) pending, as per >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428791 >> >> No idea on AFS-1.4.6 though, while we have the patch on (some?most?) >> servers, our clients are still at 1.4.4. >> >> Regards >> jan > > OK, It's sounding like we should do it for SL5, but maybe wait on SL4, > at least until SL 4.6 comes out with it to get it better tested on SL4. We will update our SL4 and SL5 clients to openafs 1.4.6 in Feb. Urs