On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, [log in to unmask] wrote: > Hi Troy, > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Troy Dawson wrote: > >> Scientific Linux "SL 5.1" RC2.5 for i386 and x86_64 January 10, 2008 >> >> -Connie Sieh >> -Troy Dawson >> >> Release Candidate 2.5 is essentially the full release. Please test. If >> there isn't any show stoppers, this will be the final release. > > testing... > > There is no isolinux directory in the i386 tree. Could that be added? Some of > our scripts look for the kernel/initrd in there or even use the content > to build install isos with customized kernel parameters. It should have been there from last time. It will clearly be there when I build the iso images. -connie sieh > > Cheers, > Stephan > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Send comments/issues/test reports to [log in to unmask] >> >> _____________________________________________________________________________ >> DOWNLOAD INFO >> _____________________________________________________________________________ >> >> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/51/i386 >> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/51/x86_64 >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> CHANGES since 5.1 RC 2.5 >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> **NumPy >> ** >> ** http://numpy.scipy.org// >> ** NumPy derives from the old Numeric code base and can be used as a >> ** replacement for Numeric. It also adds the features introduced by >> ** Numarray and can also be used to replace Numarray. >> ** >> ** This package contains: >> ** - a powerful N-dimensional array object >> ** - sophisticated (broadcasting) functions >> ** - basic linear algebra functions >> ** - basic Fourier transforms >> ** - sophisticated random number capabilities >> ** - tools for integrating Fortran code. >> ** >> ** numpy-1.0.4-1.i386.rpm >> ** numpy-1.0.4-1.x86_64.rpm >> >> >> ** rpm cleanup >> >> We have gone through The Upstream Vendors rpm list and tried our best to >> have the rpm names be the same as theirs. This includes having el5_1 being >> in the name. >> We have also gone through the rpm's checking to make sure that man pages >> match between i386 and x86_64. This stems from the problem of a compile >> time date stamp being put into man pages, and if the i386 and x86_64 rpm's >> aren't compiled on the same date, they don't match. >> > >