Glenn Morris wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> RHEL5 recently released two updates for pcre in quick succession:
> 
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1052.html   # nov 9
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0967pcre-devel-6.6-2.el.html   # nov 5
> 
> These were released as SL5 updates:
> 
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0711&L=scientific-linux-errata&T=0&P=313 # nov 6
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0711&L=scientific-linux-errata&T=0&P=2375 # nov 13
> 
> 
> It looks as if the same version numbers were used for the SL rpms in
> both cases (pcre-6.6-2.el5.1.i386.rpm etc), meaning that someone who
> has applied the first update won't get the second installed by an
> update.
> 
> Compared to the RHEL5 versions:
> 
> pcre-6.6-2.el5_1.1.i386.rpm 
> pcre-devel-6.6-2.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
> 
> the "_0", "_1" part of the name has been lost.
> 
> Thanks.

Thanks for pointing this out.  I'll look into this.

Troy

-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________