В Птн, 25/05/2007 в 11:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt пишет: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 5/24/07, Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > >At Sunday Time we spent a lot of time for testing of desktop environment > > >in a fresh installation from SL50 and was slightly frustrated by > > >crushing of Evolution during startup. In CentOS Evolution started > > >without problems (but it has version 2.8.0-33, not 2.8.0-33.0.1). > > > > > > > Yes there were a lot of issues the CentOS team found with the default > > Evolution. They had to back port a couple of issues to get stability > > in place. Crap. I must have forgotten to put it in the > > RELEASE_NOTES... if I did, sorry > > If we did, it's not in the changelog of the evolution rpm. And I cannot > really find anything regarding that with a quick search. *AND*: We're > at 2.8.0-33.0.1.el5 also (when you count in the 0day updates which > occured *directly* after release). > > But yes, we found a lot of issues with Evolution: One is that it's still > not an app one wants to use :) Of course, Evolution is not ideal user app-n :(, but "who in this land is fairest of all?” ;) In any case, evolution-data-server widely used like a unified backend for programs that work with contacts, tasks, and calendar information by many other applications, for example: nautilus, gnome-panel applets, gaim, planner, ekiga and some other GNOME application => we are doomed to use this one... > Cheers, > Ralph --Oleg