Hi All, Unfortunately, I will miss Thursday afternoon session - sorry, bad timing on my part. However, I would be very in favor of a "small informal SL meeting" in advanced, possible on Wednesday. As Knut said, this could create useful input for the public session on Thursday afternoon. So what's about a SL lunch on Wednesday? Or sometime between last storage talk (around 16:30?) and Workshop dinner (19:00)? Any other proposal? Urs Stephan Wiesand wrote: > Hi All, > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, [log in to unmask] wrote: > >> Hi again, >> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Jan Iven wrote: >>> Good idea except for the time. Knut had reserved a session for Thursday >>> afternoon. >>> >>> His proposed topics were: >>> - changes in SL5 >> >> this will be covered by Connie. >> >>> - 32 vs 64 bit compatibility issues >>> - rollout status at the labs >>> - the "rebasing to CentOS" discussion >>> - [whatever else you consider interesting or important] >> >> I haven't received any feedback on these. Any takers? I know that at >> least > > If noone else wants to do this, I could summarize the "rebasing to > CentOS" discussion, talk about differences and similarities between SL > and CentOS, and point out the options for the future of SL. This would > hopefully spark > a discussion. > >> Urs, Connie, Jan, Stephan and myself will be on site. VRVS >> participation is possible. >> >> This does not contradict a "small circle" developer's meeting (or >> lunch/dinner session) earlier in the week. Maybe such a meeting would >> even create new content for public session. > > Example: What are sites planning to do about their remaining SL3 > systems after the EOL date in autumn? > >>> I will only arrive Tuesday night and leave Thursday night. Perhaps we >>> can still shuffle around things? >> >> As I mentioned, Tuesday afternoon is mostly void. Wednesday is packed >> with > > Tuesday would be without Jan, which doesn't make much sense either. > Late Wednesday will clash with the dinner, especially if the storage > talks & discussions exceed their schedule, which is not unlikely. > >> storage presentations. SL folks could meet in parallel (then without >> me). I > > I wouldn't want to miss any of the storage talks either. > >> have scheduled SL in the afternoon to ease North American VRVS >> participation (though I admit it is already very early). > > Having Troy with us would certainly be good. Troy, are you planning to > participate? > > Stephan >