> I see very little benifit in having a seperate "branded" distro for > > that. seems like a lot of effort. A "branded" installer which installs > > baseOS + addon repo... now that make sense. Good point .. > > > > LSB is what we should be asking vendors to certify against and ask Linux > > distros to certify against. Then we have choice. > > Again: very good point ! (and then if they certify for RHEL as right now: it is still not that bad giving that SL/CentOS aims at 100% compatibility) > > Oh yes... of course pine was "ditched" because it was illeagal to > > distrubute as I recall (which seems like a good reason to me)... so even > > a seperate repository is no good there. hmm. I seems that most people have it in their SL(X) repos ... Jarek__ ------------------------------------------------------- _ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/FIO/LA _ _ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _ _____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _