On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:29:17PM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote: > Conclusion: > Troys Opinion: It's obvious we need to either stay with kernel-module > or switch over to kdml. I vote for going with kdml, and make that into > the standard. It think eventually Fedora and RedHat will see that this > way is less work, easier to implement, and just plain works. I am not > so set on this idea that I cannot be persuaded to continue with > kernel-module. I would - of course - be very much interested in seeing the kmdl methods becoming more widespread. I'm also working on a kmdl2 spec which will render specfiles even a bit smaller and thus easier to maintain. Another pro on kmdls is that it intergrates easy with yum/apt with a plugin (similar to kernel-module packaging), while schemes w/o unamer-in-name have real troubles to get going under yum/apt. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net