Jon, On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Jon Peatfield wrote: > > So, the end result is going to be > > > > bugfix-308 > > bugfix-44 > > These are repositories that point to just the non-errata updates that come > > out with the next release. Currently those should be empty. They will be > > populated when update 8, and update 4 come out. (The next releases will have > > bugfix-45 and maybe bugfix-309, and so forth) > > Ok. In which case the following in the 43/i386/errata/bugfix-44/RPMS/ > directory probably ought to be signed: I specifically did these but a excludes in my rsync script missed them. Will rsync them over. -Connie > > apr-devel-0.9.4-24.5.i386.rpm failed signature check! > apr-0.9.4-24.5.i386.rpm failed signature check! > apr-util-devel-0.9.4-21.i386.rpm failed signature check! > apr-util-0.9.4-21.i386.rpm failed signature check! > at-3.1.8-78_EL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! autofs-4.1.3-155.i386.rpm > failed signature check! booty-0.44.3-1.i386.rpm failed signature check! > device-mapper-multipath-0.4.5-6.0.RHEL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > control-center-2.8.0-12.rhel4.2.i386.rpm failed signature check! > crash-4.0-2.i386.rpm failed signature check! > device-mapper-1.01.04-1.0.RHEL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > dmraid-1.0.0.rc8-1_RHEL4_U2.i386.rpm failed signature check! > diskdumputils-1.1.9-4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > e2fsprogs-1.35-12.2.EL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > dump-0.4b39-3.EL4.2.i386.rpm failed signature check! > evolution-data-server-devel-1.0.2-9.i386.rpm failed signature check! > e2fsprogs-devel-1.35-12.2.EL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > evolution-connector-2.0.2-8.i386.rpm failed signature check! rpmstream: > evolution-data-server-1.0.2-9.i386.rpm failed signature check > evolution-webcal-1.0.10-3.i386.rpm failed signature check! > gamin-0.1.1-3.EL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > gamin-devel-0.1.1-3.EL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > gamin-python-0.1.1-3.EL4.i386.rpm failed signature check! > rmt-0.4b39-3.EL4.2.i386.rpm failed signature check! > j2sdk-1.4.2_10-fcs.i586.rpm failed signature check! > > (ok I know why the last one can't be). > > For the x86_64 tree I just get the j2sdk-1.4.2_10-fcs.i586.rpm failing the > sig-check (as expectd). > > In case anyone else is trying to make x86_64 install-trees on i686 > hardware I now have a fairly simple recipe which seems to work for me > (fiddling with a copy of the rhpl python package to avoid it looking for > the arch in /etc/rpm/platform)... > > -- Jon >