On ש', 2005-12-03 at 14:10 +0200, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Maxim Kovgan wrote: > > On ש', 2005-12-03 at 13:54 +0200, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > > >>==> I have also filled it as a bug for SL 4.x in the bug tracking system, since there was > >>no option for SL 4.2 there. > >> > >> > >>Having just upgraded to SL 4.2 from SL 4.1 via yum upgrade, and wanted to use apt-get, I > >>performed: > > > Have you used 'apt-get -f install' as _suggested_ ? > > > I think it should work out of the box. I think that obviously there is a mistake in the > dependencies, and thus it qualifies as a bug. the problem of dist-upgrade, which is not a regular upgrade. If you want to jump a release, it is a _complicated_ thing - the apt-get system must meet future dependencies, and stay operable... anyway, if you do apt-get dist-upgrade you should be serious and confident enough to be able to run 'apt-get -f install' --M. > > > > > >>>But IANAL, of course. > > IANAL either. My son is, but if I asked > > > > him I might get an answer I > wouldn't want to hear. "Here's my > > invoice." ? =D > > That was not in my original email. :-) Only adults have difficulty with childproof caps.