Gerald, I am confused I get i386. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root@linux03 base]# pwd /export/linux/scientific/41/i386/SL/base [root@linux03 base]# rpm -qp --queryformat "%{name}\t%{arch}\n" comps.rpm comps i386 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I assume you meant 41 since that is what you had in your email. -Connie Sieh On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Connie Sieh wrote: > Gerald, > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Gerald Teschl wrote: > > > By looking for grub errors I noticed some anaconda errors indicating that > > comps.rpm has the wrong arch. In fact: > > > > # rpm -qp --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}.rpm\n" comps.rpm > > comps-41-0.20050727.x86_64.rpm > > Thats what happens when you build both x86_64 and i386 on the same system. > I have since added checks to my build scripts. > > > > > Shouldn't it be "noarch"? > > It should be i386. Not that anything in there is either i386 or x86_64 > but that is they way it comes from the upstream vendor. > > > > > Gerald > > > > Thanks for telling me about this. Now have to decide what to do about it > as comps.rpm is not really that exciting. > > -Connie Sieh >