I have just booted Scientific Linux 3.0.2 x86_64 with the install cd on a Athlon 64 system with Silicon Image 3112 and it saw it just fine. I assume the code for 3114 is that same. The code is in there, it was not left out. -Connie Sieh On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Michael David Joy wrote: > I was trying to install the x86_64 version, and the default build > options are most likely different between the two i386 and x86_64 > versions. > > I know there is a few bug tracks in for low performance of this > controller in the redhat support database, but it's supposed to be > supported in update release 2 that's been out for some time now. > > Thanks for looking into this! > > Michael > On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 15:25, csieh wrote: > > Michael, > > > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Michael David Joy wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I have a question about sata support in SL R3.02. > > > > > > I just finished building 3 dual opteron boxes with 2048MB of mem in a > > > NUMA config. The boards have silicon image 3114 chips for the 250GB > > > drives in the systems, however it appears that sata_sil support was left > > > out of the scientific linux boot kernel. I believe Redhat Enterprise > > > supports this chipset just fine, but somehow it got left out of this > > > release's kernel build. > > > > I know the code is in the i386 kernel for at least some version of the > > Silicon Image chips as I have installed from that. The kernel is the > > standard RedHat kernel recompiled. I will research. > > > > -Connie Sieh > > > > > > > > In other words, SL 3.02 won't install because it can't detect the sata > > > controller. The boards are Tyan S2882 Thunder K8S Pro's R1.02. > > > > > > Can anyone comment on this? I've resorted to installing Fedora Core 2 > > > x86_64 for the time being and it is working perfectly. As we are going > > > to build more systems like this, I'd like to know if there's any work > > > being done on this. Admittedly I can probably build a custom kernel and > > > put it on a boot floppy to install SL, but this is a less than ideal > > > solution. I'd like to have the kernel already built and on the dvd I'm > > > using for installing without having to roll my own custom SL distro. > > > > > > I'm open to suggestions. > > > > > > Michael Joy > > > HEP - University of Mississippi > > > [log in to unmask] > > > > >