So, can we assume then that the web page will be updated as well by next week? Should I tell my fellow associates to hold off on downloading this version until the final SL release is available? I assume the differences will be minor.... It's always nice to have beta testers trying out new release candicates, but should I advise them to wait before installing SL on a production box? Will there be that much difference? The yum.conf file should be a minor change that can be easily modified to accomodate the new SL FTP location. Thanks. KJ -- /------------------------------------\__/-------------------------\ | Kerry J. Cox, Ph.D. __ [log in to unmask] | | KSL System Administrator | | p: 801.575.7771 | \------------------------------------/ \-------------------------/ On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 20:39, Connie Sieh wrote: > Release is expected next week. > > The location on our ftp server has changed to > > ftp://linux21.fnal.gov/linux/scientific/30rolling/ > > The following rpms were changed to reflect this change. > > yum-conf-sl301-6.noarch.rpm > apt-sourceslist-SL-3.0.1-2.i386.rpm > > mpg321, xmms-mpg123 > > The following rpms were added to satisfy dependencies of mpg321 > and xmms-mpg123 > > libmad-0.15.1b-1.fr.i386.rpm > libmad-devel-0.15.1b-1.fr.i386.rpm > libid3tag-0.15.1b-1.fr.i386.rpm > libid3tag-devel-0.15.1b-1.fr.i386.rpm > > Mozilla > > Changed bookmarks to Scientific Linux web page and misc other > Linux related web pages. > > Documentation > > Added script on building site iso cd images in > /sites/example/build/scripts/buildisoimages > > Added a script to take the iso cd images built above and build a > dvd iso image. This script was obtained from the web. It is > called /sites/example/build/scripts/buildisoimages/make.dvdiso.sh > > Added to the documentation in /sites/build/documentation/ > > -connie sieh