Hi Troy Dawson wrote: > Looks like I missed one > SL_inittab_change > > any others? Troy: We have been discussing packaging yesterday and we came to a conclusion that we should use some common naming guidelines, alike: package-name-VERSION-RELEASE.SITE (I'll work on CERN stuff to be renamed this way) I think If you are already rebuilding all these you could rename them too: SL_desktop_tweeks-1.1-1 -> desktop_tweeks-1.1-1.SL etc .. just an idea .. As for the list below: >> SL_sendmail_accept-1.0-2.src.rpm -> this one is not installed by default , is it ? (we at CERN do not allow individual machines to accept SMTP by default ... I'm sure that there are other sites doing this) > > > SL_inittab_change-1.0-4.src.rpm I'm not sure what is this one doing ? >> Are there any more rpm's that do these little tweeks that I should put >> in? >> (I'm meaning generic tweeks, not site specific tweeks) We have a modified redhat-config-securitylevel which adds an option for AFS client (basically opening afs3-callback port for incoming): Would that one be of generic interest ? - I think that openafs itself is also interesting for lot of sites: I *think* that compiling krb5 in (which you do as I understand) does not disturb people who use krb4 only (or mixed) setups (we always have disabled krb5 for oa builds) ? I will repackage our apt,apt-cern and synaptic (slightly newer version than in SL) to have: apt packages - not including any site-specific info apt-autoupdate - scripts for using apt from cronjob (service apt-autoupdate disabled by default) apt-config-X.Y.SITE packages (or apt-config-site-X.Y if anybody wants to have more than one site config for apt) Also probably additional perl modules we provide are useful for others (but these shall rather go into contrib area I believe ?) Jarek __ ------------------------------------------------------- _ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/ADC/LE _ _ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _ _____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _