SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 May 2021 08:07:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:35 PM Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Any news or updates on the status of CERN Linux?

Many sysadmins are... unhappy about CentOS 8 Stream. The idea that
CentOS is no longer a clone but instead the beta testing playground
for RHEL has profoundly upset them. RHEL is making lightweight and
"free for education" licenses more available, but it's been awkward.
RHEL 8 introduced some profoundly unwelcome features, such as
"Modularity", the multiple overlapping and unnecessary yum channels,
the deliberate exclusion of devel packages built with the other RPMs
and used internally for compilation such as "quota-devel", and the lag
in the primary python 3 release which python 3.8 and is now 5 years
old, there doesn't seem a lot of benefit to using CentOS 8 Stream. I
don't consider RHEL 8 to be Red Hat's best work.

The risks of always being the beta tester with unpredictable updates
to core components, and the insistence that we all "drink the stream"
rather than publishing point releases was unannounced. If we want
stable point releases, we have to make them ourselves now for internal
use. I publish tools you're quite welcome to use for that, at
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_nkadel_nkadel-2Drsync-2Dscripts&d=DwIBaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=FrA4u_F4qNzRloEH_QYdcE599Vq4gX8CHEH7PWbN-fY&s=Ohu4K9C8jRTEZfUI2gciYivzXp9NkCzwDFjkxTCtUKQ&e=  .

ATOM RSS1 RSS2