SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
c++17,17,20... - was Re: [SL-Users] Re: any update on CERN Linux and CentOS-8 situation?
From:
Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 May 2021 23:00:00 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
On Tue, 4 May 2021, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:

> - first slide of "distribution landscape" is nonsense,
> with everybody stuck with el7 for another 3 years and
> bye, bye, c++14, c++17, c++20.

Is Red Hat Developer Toolset 10
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__access.redhat.com_documentation_en-2Dus_red-5Fhat-5Fdeveloper-5Ftoolset_10_html_10.0-5Frelease-5Fnotes_dts10.0-5Frelease-23Changes-5Fin-5FDTS&d=DwIBAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=Chv7ZrLnQII3dvv1o48KTg7YAxT9SNUUCkOkflNOCd4&s=bZUlWtCI03IJ95QWY-_DTkmqMdwOzXq8PVBkiR1dZLM&e= 
not an option ?

(OK, C++20 support in g++ 10.2.1 is "experimental).

-- 
Andrew C. Aitchison					Kendal, UK
 			[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2