SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stuart Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stuart Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:20:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:10:00 +0000, Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I'm not sure I understand the question being asked.
>
>Fastbug packages remain in the fastbug repo until:
>
>- there is a new release (ie 7.10) of the os
>- a security errata requires the updated package for installation
>
>At this point I do not estimate that glibc-2.17-323.el7_9 move from the
>fastbug repo.  A new release (ie 7.10) would almost certainly include a
>newer glibc package, and I'd not expect a security errata that requires
>this updated package.

Pat,

My bad...all makes sense.

Thanks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2