SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:47:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
This is not the topic below, but it is a comparison of volunteer 
maintained distros to those professionally maintained.  My understanding 
is that Pat is a Fermilab employed professional whose employment duties 
include what one reads below -- not on a fully volunteer basis.  This 
employed professional support presumably will end with the EOL of SL. 
Will AL have a list such as this and someone equivalent to Pat (this 
question assumes that there are AL "people" on this list)?  I appreciate 
volunteers, but I rely upon those who also are gainfully employed to do 
the work.

On 4/12/21 7:10 AM, Patrick Riehecky wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm not sure I understand the question being asked.
> 
> Fastbug packages remain in the fastbug repo until:
> 
> - there is a new release (ie 7.10) of the os
> - a security errata requires the updated package for installation
> 
> At this point I do not estimate that glibc-2.17-323.el7_9 move from the
> fastbug repo.  A new release (ie 7.10) would almost certainly include a
> newer glibc package, and I'd not expect a security errata that requires
> this updated package.
> 
> Pat
> 
> On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 15:15 -0500, Stuart Anderson wrote:
>> Any estimate on when glibc-2.17-323.el7_9 from Feb will move from
>> FASTBUGS to the main SL7 repo?
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2