Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | ~Stack~ |
Date: | Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:34:24 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2/11/21 2:25 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:59 PM Dietrich, Stefan
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> you might be running into this issue: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925204
>>
>> This has been introduced with glibc-2.17-322.el7_9 and has been fixed in glibc-2.17-323.el7_9.
>> CentOS 7 already ships the updated version, on SL7 the version seems to be not yet available.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stefan
>
> Looks like the glibc-2.17-323.el7_9 update (RHBA-2021:0439) is not a
> security fix. SL usually publishes non-security updates on Tuesdays.
> Unless the devs decide to make it an exception, the update will be out
> on next Tue, Feb 16.
>
> Akemi
>
Awesome! Thank you both. I think you are absolutely onto something. This
also may explain why I can't get it to work reliably on my upstream
vendor OS. Even though they are all the same coreutils version, I've got
different versions of glibc running on them (we have a rolling update
cycle for certain environments to help catch upgrade errors). Some are
older and some are newer. The one having the problem is the same version.
I didn't even think to check glibc.
I will wait till next Tuesday. Thank you!
|
|
|