SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:55:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:49 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:12 AM Serguei Mokhov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers
> >
> > Thoughts?

Someone noticed that almost *no one* wants RHEL 8, and is trying to
get some kind of deployment numbers, even for unpaid subscriptions.
This is a replay of what happened with Red Hat 9 back in 2003. I
expect a name change of some sort for the next major release and
hopefully a reversion to cooperating with open source point releases.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2