SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 01:17:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:14 AM Benson Muite
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On 1/24/21 9:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Serguei Mokhov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of itself to support SystemD.
> >>> There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there were and are better init systems
> >>> to replace SysVInit than SystemD. "Better" being both a technical and a political/social/industrial construct.
> >>
> >> Mark, please name the better ones. And possibly why have they not been
> >> widely adopted?
> >
> > daemontools. I publish RPM wrappers for it at
>
> OpenRC is used in Alpine Linux, which has widespread adoption for
> containers. Any thoughts on it? Busybox/Toybox also have their own init
> systems.

I never had occasion to touch it.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2