Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jan 2021 01:17:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:14 AM Benson Muite
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On 1/24/21 9:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Serguei Mokhov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of itself to support SystemD.
> >>> There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there were and are better init systems
> >>> to replace SysVInit than SystemD. "Better" being both a technical and a political/social/industrial construct.
> >>
> >> Mark, please name the better ones. And possibly why have they not been
> >> widely adopted?
> >
> > daemontools. I publish RPM wrappers for it at
>
> OpenRC is used in Alpine Linux, which has widespread adoption for
> containers. Any thoughts on it? Busybox/Toybox also have their own init
> systems.
I never had occasion to touch it.
|
|
|