SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Benson Muite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Benson Muite <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:14:24 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 1/24/21 9:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Serguei Mokhov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of itself to support SystemD.
>>> There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there were and are better init systems
>>> to replace SysVInit than SystemD. "Better" being both a technical and a political/social/industrial construct.
>>
>> Mark, please name the better ones. And possibly why have they not been
>> widely adopted?
> 
> daemontools. I publish RPM wrappers for it at

OpenRC is used in Alpine Linux, which has widespread adoption for 
containers. Any thoughts on it? Busybox/Toybox also have their own init 
systems.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2