Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="VRHo7ZyLifA5MJfuJQlMqISMq6a0N6YKf" |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:13:18 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 1/27/21 4:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> Now, any chance of fixed package for SL6? (just checked, no fix in CERN SLC6, no fix in EPEL).
I was under the impression that SL6 went EOL in November 2020, so I
imagine there won't be an update.
Cheers
Adam
--VRHo7ZyLifA5MJfuJQlMqISMq6a0N6YKf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=6ugH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VRHo7ZyLifA5MJfuJQlMqISMq6a0N6YKf--
|
|
|