SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:17:05 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:09:47PM +0000, Jose Marques wrote:
> > On 16 Oct 2020, at 22:06, Jon Pruente <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > That article is from July. It's been fixed. Is there another issue you are having?

That's right. Old news.

Red Hat broke the bootloader way back when by switching to grub and later switching to grub2.

grub2 "is good" only for people who never worked with other boot loaders (syslinux/pxelinux, uboot, etc).

On modern machines, UEFI BIOS can boot Linux directly (with a secureboot shim), and grub is an unnecessary.

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2