Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:10:16 +0200 |
Content-Type: | multipart/signed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Am 27.08.20 um 02:29 schrieb Yasha Karant:
> I still am attempting to migrate to Texstudio 3 production current
> release. I have found on the Texstudio web site an appimage file for
> Texstudio 3.
>
> From:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__itsfoss.com_use-2Dappimage-2Dlinux_-23-3A-7E-3Atext-3D-2520How-2520to-2520use-2520AppImage-2520in-2520Linux-2520-2CStep-25203-253A-2520Run-2520the-2520AppImage-2520file-2520More-2520&d=DwIDaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=A1vT-VWIR0wKymGxmZBrmYvDO6ec1JTnvizEqWzIpkA&s=03Rv0itPKadgSlR6ylyg3oj3iQHNQOMDlIK77t3Ny1k&e=
>
> NB: Because I cannot seem to have my email changed from csusb.edu to
> gmail.com , the above URL will be modified and perhaps garbled.
>
> AppImage doesn’t do it. In fact, AppImage doesn’t really install the
> software. It is a compressed image with all the dependencies and
> libraries needed to run the desired software.
>
> However, after as root doing a chmod a+x on texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage
> I find:
>
> ykarant@localhost Downloads]$ ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by
> /tmp/.mount_texstuAlu96i/usr/bin/../lib/libQt5Core.so.5)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by
> /tmp/.mount_texstuAlu96i/usr/bin/../lib/libpoppler.so.58)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by
> /tmp/.mount_texstuAlu96i/usr/bin/../lib/libproxy.so.1)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by
> /tmp/.mount_texstuAlu96i/usr/bin/../lib/libproxy.so.1)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by
> /tmp/.mount_texstuAlu96i/usr/bin/../lib/libicui18n.so.55)
> ./texstudio-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
> `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by
> /tmp/.mount_texstuAlu96i/usr/bin/../lib/libicuuc.so.55)
>
> End output.
>
> Thus, clearly "image with all the dependencies and libraries needed to
> run" is not factual. Are the required .so lib files available for EL 7
> and will not cause other applications/kernel to fail? If these are
> available, relevant URLs (or what to install under yum) would be
> appreciated.
Dear Yasha,
yes, the claim of bundling all dependencies is invalid, there are
exceptions for the C library and the C++ standard library. These are so
important you cannot update them on your Scientific Linux machine
without breaking it.
I think you cannot install this software on SL7, it is simply too old. A
container solution like Singularity would have problems as well, as
there is a certain kernel dependence. I can report from my own
experience, that a container based on Ubuntu 20.04 and Qt5 will still
not run on SL7.
The only way to run it would be a real virtual machine.
Regards,
Götz Waschk
--
Götz Waschk ° Phone: +49 33762 77169
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY ° Fax: +49 33762 77216
Platanenallee 6 ° E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
15738 Zeuthen Germany
|
|
|