SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:31:15 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
The plan is to retire the SL6 docker image once SL6 is end of life.



With no one watching the security updates and the repos moved over to 

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/obsolete/ I'm not sure

the image would have any useful function.



Pat



On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 10:30 +0000, Teh, Kenneth M. wrote:

> After this November's end of life for SL6, will you continue to make

> the sl6 image available on docker hub?

> 

> ________________________________________

> From: Teh, Kenneth M. <[log in to unmask]>

> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:15 AM

> To: Patrick Riehecky; scientific-linux-users

> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] recommended sl6 containers

> 

> Thanks.  I've pulled it (I think).

> 

> ________________________________________

> From: Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>

> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:01 AM

> To: Teh, Kenneth M.; scientific-linux-users

> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] recommended sl6 containers

> 

> Hello,

> 

> We've got official images in Docker Hub[1]

> 

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hub.docker.com_-5F_sl&d=DwIFAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=sHzXDNLv8omo5deM2ZMDptbSwnBdv0WoIIp--TKHp9s&s=RmYdcL-ZvIeJReEfdPkg2oSv4eNHvEGLeXdcjr9shao&e= 

> 

> Pat

> 

> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 11:20 +0000, Teh, Kenneth M. wrote:

> > Getting my feet wet with containers.  Does SL have its own registry

> > of SL6 and 7 container images? If not, can someone recommend a

> > reliable image?

> > 

> > Thanks


ATOM RSS1 RSS2