Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:32:18 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:14 AM Larry Linder
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> We liked how samba allow us to connect all systems. Now even the Win 8
>> and 10 machines do not see any of the other systems. They all see the
>> other win machines but none of the linux machines. On systems that are
>> running VMWare the win machines can see VM. I also found out that a
>> number of BeagleBone Black on the network were running smb and were
>> visible. Last Saturday for an hr or so the smb network was running and
>> I could access everything. I resarted smb on the server and it all went
>> away.
>>
>> I shut down all the devices on the network except for 1 Win 8 box and 1
>> SL 6.10 box. Nothing.
>
> Stop there. Seriously. Stop using SL 6.10 as a server, the base
> operating system is 10 years old, the Samba is tremendously out of
> date and the client hosts you expect to play nicely with it have real
> differences in their CIFS behavior. If you have lightweight content to
> share from the old SL 6 environments, NFS share it to an SL 7 or SL 8
> and run Samba there.
Nico, If I understand correctly the clients for this SMB
service are *old* windows machines, running XP at the latest.
Larry, If I am wrong and the historical apps are running on SL6,
I would recommend moving them to some sort of container - singularity
is the one I have used. This way the apps see an SL6 environment *and*
the filesystem of the host (eg SL7) machine.
Yes it will be a pain to print to file in a container window,
then print the file from a host window, but there are ways around that.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|