SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:41:19 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
The new IPA should be going out to 7.7 and older security repos now.



Thanks for the report!



Pat



On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 13:24 +0000, Patrick Riehecky wrote:

> Good to know! I'll see about getting IPA scheduled in as a security

> errata to help other folks down the road.

> 

> Pat

> 

> On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 15:32 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:

> > It looks like the SL 7 samba security updates break IPA when

> > applied

> > onto an

> > IPA server:

> > 

> > Apr 21 14:00:32 systemd[1]: Starting Samba SMB Daemon...

> > Apr 21 14:00:33 smbd[2121]: [2020/04/21 14:00:33.520169,  0]

> > ../../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:171(make_pdb_method_name)

> > Apr 21 14:00:33 smbd[2121]:   No builtin nor plugin backend for

> > ipasam found

> > 

> > This is because the IPA updates are not part of the security

> > updates

> > and then

> > the IPA plugin for samba is out of sync.

> > 

> > Updating fully to SL 7.8 resolved the issue for me.

> > 


ATOM RSS1 RSS2