SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:58:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On 17/03/2020 19:51, James M. Pulver wrote:
> I mostly hate the new network names, and I generally find that they're
> fixing something that was never broken for us, but I imagine there was some
> way you could get your eth* interfaces confused on reboot I guess. Strange
> that the latest vyos which is a router distro designed for lots of
> different interfaces that need to stay consistent through reboots still
> uses eth*.
The need for this might not be clear.  But the old eth* scheme was tied to the
MAC address of the interface.  This new scheme allows hardware to more clearly
define the interface name based on the hardware location and not the interface
itself.

The use case is: A server needs to replace a NIC for some reason.  The process
is to shutdown the server, remove the old interface and insert the new one and
boot it up again.  And everything should work as before.

Using the old eth* schema would require modifying configuration files to
configure the replaced interface to use the old configuration.  While the new
approach fixes this, as the configuration is tied to the mainboard slot the
interface is inserted into, not the interface MAC address.

This might or might not be useful, depending on your needs.  The old eth*
approach was easy, because it was short and swift and used since the early
days.  But I do see the old approach could be a burden to larger data centers.


-- 
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

ATOM RSS1 RSS2