SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2019

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare)
Date:
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:53:58 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Gotcha -- I take it the version SRPMS directories are softlinked to 7x. 

Hmmm... gonna have to tweak scripts on our end.

Thanks!
-- Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:17 PM
To: Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXT: Re: 7x fastbugs (was: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64)


> On 3. Sep 2019, at 23:23, Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Next question -- I saw Farhan's email about fastbugs being made available in the 7x repository. We pull fastbugs from 7.6/updates/fastbugs; when I reposync'ed with your 7.6 repos, I got the sources for these fastbug fixes from 7.6/SRPMS, but not the associated fastbug binary packages themselves from 7.6/updates/fastbugs. Does this mean that I can expect to see these fastbug binaries turn up in 7.6/updates/fastbugs at some point, or is something screwy going on?

Neither nor. I think fastbugs errata are only issued for the latest minor release - which currently is 7.7.

-- Stephan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2