SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2019

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:05:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
I'll look into this.

Pat

On 6/10/19 9:59 AM, Phil Gold wrote:
> I've been having two problems with the newest docker packages in the
> sl-extras repository for Scientific Linux 7.  I'm not sure where to report
> them so hopefully someone here will help.
>
>
> The first problem appears to be one of packaging.  The systemd unit file
> for docker-1.13.1-96.gitb2f74b2.sl7.x86_64 contains references to
> `rhel-push-plugin.socket`, which is not present in any Scientific Linux
> packages, as far as I can tell.  I have to remove all references to that
> unit file in order to start docker.  The previous RPM
> (1.13.1-94.gitb2f74b2.sl7) did not have this problem.
>
>
> The second problem is that I cannot `docker exec` things in some (but not
> all) of my containers.  For the ones that fail, I get the following error
> message:
>
>      rpc error: code = 2 desc = oci runtime error: exec failed: container_linux.go:235: starting container process caused "process_linux.go:110: decoding init error from pipe caused \"read parent: connection reset by peer\""
>
> This looks to me a lot like bug #1655214 in the Red Hat Bugzilla:
>
>    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.redhat.com_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D1655214&d=DwIBAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=cUDmEKgsvyvfXqxPWpSYuUAAT0eU2MkIq2JcEGVEAUY&s=td7JS4nXUFG8wQzmEEoEIlnKTwj8InHnoIurYBnXeX4&e=
>
> Unfortunately, that bug was closed with Red Hat's 1.13.1-88git07f3374.el7
> docker RPM, whereas I'm seeing problems with Scientific Linux's
> 1.13.1-96.gitb2f74b2.sl7 and 1.13.1-94.gitb2f74b2.sl7 docker RPMs.
>
> Is it possible I'm doing something wrong, or is this a bug that should be
> reported?  If it's a bug, where should I report it (and my other problem)?
> I haven't found anything for Scientific Linux like Red Hat's Bugzilla
> instance.
>
> Just in case it's relevant, I have four different images I've tested
> things with.  All of them are from the Docker Hub registry.
>
>   * mariadb:10 has problems.  It's ultimately based on ubuntu:bionic.
>
>   * mediawiki:1.31 has problems.  It's ultimately based on
>     debian:stretch-slim.
>
>   * centos/httpd-24-centos7 does not have problems.  It's ultimately based
>     on centos:7.
>
>   * dperson/samba:latest has problems.  It's ultimately based on
>     alpine:latest.
>
> `docker exec` works properly on all of them when I'm using the
> docker-1.13.1-91.git07f3374.sl7 RPM from the sl-extras repository.  The
> problems consistently appear, both in my images and in the base images,
> with any later RPMs.
>

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2