I've dropped a possible fix package in the sl-testing repo.

Can you try it to see if this resolves your issue?

On 6/10/19 1:05 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> I'll look into this.
>
> Pat
>
> On 6/10/19 9:59 AM, Phil Gold wrote:
>> I've been having two problems with the newest docker packages in the
>> sl-extras repository for Scientific Linux 7.  I'm not sure where to 
>> report
>> them so hopefully someone here will help.
>>
>>
>> The first problem appears to be one of packaging.  The systemd unit file
>> for docker-1.13.1-96.gitb2f74b2.sl7.x86_64 contains references to
>> `rhel-push-plugin.socket`, which is not present in any Scientific Linux
>> packages, as far as I can tell.  I have to remove all references to that
>> unit file in order to start docker.  The previous RPM
>> (1.13.1-94.gitb2f74b2.sl7) did not have this problem.
>>
>>
>> The second problem is that I cannot `docker exec` things in some (but 
>> not
>> all) of my containers.  For the ones that fail, I get the following 
>> error
>> message:
>>
>>      rpc error: code = 2 desc = oci runtime error: exec failed: 
>> container_linux.go:235: starting container process caused 
>> "process_linux.go:110: decoding init error from pipe caused \"read 
>> parent: connection reset by peer\""
>>
>> This looks to me a lot like bug #1655214 in the Red Hat Bugzilla:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.redhat.com_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D1655214&d=DwIBAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=cUDmEKgsvyvfXqxPWpSYuUAAT0eU2MkIq2JcEGVEAUY&s=td7JS4nXUFG8wQzmEEoEIlnKTwj8InHnoIurYBnXeX4&e=
>>
>> Unfortunately, that bug was closed with Red Hat's 
>> 1.13.1-88git07f3374.el7
>> docker RPM, whereas I'm seeing problems with Scientific Linux's
>> 1.13.1-96.gitb2f74b2.sl7 and 1.13.1-94.gitb2f74b2.sl7 docker RPMs.
>>
>> Is it possible I'm doing something wrong, or is this a bug that 
>> should be
>> reported?  If it's a bug, where should I report it (and my other 
>> problem)?
>> I haven't found anything for Scientific Linux like Red Hat's Bugzilla
>> instance.
>>
>> Just in case it's relevant, I have four different images I've tested
>> things with.  All of them are from the Docker Hub registry.
>>
>>   * mariadb:10 has problems.  It's ultimately based on ubuntu:bionic.
>>
>>   * mediawiki:1.31 has problems.  It's ultimately based on
>>     debian:stretch-slim.
>>
>>   * centos/httpd-24-centos7 does not have problems.  It's ultimately 
>> based
>>     on centos:7.
>>
>>   * dperson/samba:latest has problems.  It's ultimately based on
>>     alpine:latest.
>>
>> `docker exec` works properly on all of them when I'm using the
>> docker-1.13.1-91.git07f3374.sl7 RPM from the sl-extras repository.  The
>> problems consistently appear, both in my images and in the base images,
>> with any later RPMs.
>>
>

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org