SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

February 2019

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:12:16 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I'll take a look.

Thanks!

Pat

On 2/13/19 4:10 AM, Paddy Doyle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that there have been two recent package updates for the
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg.x86_64 package, only differing in the package suffix
> 'el7' vs 'sl7'.
>
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.2.el7_6.x86_64.rpm -> timestamp 29-Jan-2019
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.2.sl7_6.x86_64.rpm -> timestamp 06-Feb-2019
>
>
> According to the changelog in both packages, they are identical:
>
>    diff -u <(rpm -qp --changelog xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.2.el7_6.x86_64.rpm) <(rpm -qp --changelog xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.2.sl7_6.x86_64.rpm)
>
>
> It could be nothing, but just thought I'd mention because there were
> similar issues in the past with upgrades getting stuck because of the 'el7'
> vs 'sl7' suffix.
>
> Thanks,
> Paddy
>

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2